<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decade of Literary Hypermedia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hydramag.com/2010/01/29/the-decade-of-literary-hypermedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hydramag.com/2010/01/29/the-decade-of-literary-hypermedia/</link>
	<description>Literary arts magazine dedicated to the wayward, ordinary, bizarre, everyday, and the impossible.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:33:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiro</title>
		<link>http://www.hydramag.com/2010/01/29/the-decade-of-literary-hypermedia/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehydramag.com/?p=1645#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>great post, anelise. apropos of your comment on the demand for digital scholarship, I think an interesting parallel development to e-lit is the rise of digital humanities, such as the kind published by USC&#039;s &quot;Vectors Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular&quot; and the Center for History and New Media at GMU. hopefully your prediction that such e-fields will take off in the 10s will become realized - so as to create a fleshed out dialogue between the digital criticism and the lit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post, anelise. apropos of your comment on the demand for digital scholarship, I think an interesting parallel development to e-lit is the rise of digital humanities, such as the kind published by USC&#8217;s &#8220;Vectors Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular&#8221; and the Center for History and New Media at GMU. hopefully your prediction that such e-fields will take off in the 10s will become realized &#8211; so as to create a fleshed out dialogue between the digital criticism and the lit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anelise Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.hydramag.com/2010/01/29/the-decade-of-literary-hypermedia/#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>Anelise Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehydramag.com/?p=1645#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>mark, thanks for your comment! so happy that you&#039;ve stopped by. you&#039;re completely right about afternoon and victory garden--they were the first hypertexts but unfortunately i failed to mention them because i never got a chance to read them. also, re: my body, wunderkammer, i&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s important to police the lines between fiction and autobiography but you&#039;re certainly right in arguing that patchwork girl is better known...personally i saw them as equal works by an important writer and just had more to say about my body, wunderkammer. i wasn&#039;t so much trying to do a straight history as a quick zoom in zoom out spotlight on a handful of works. there are too many to mention in so short a space. very excited to be engaging in this convo with you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mark, thanks for your comment! so happy that you&#8217;ve stopped by. you&#8217;re completely right about afternoon and victory garden&#8211;they were the first hypertexts but unfortunately i failed to mention them because i never got a chance to read them. also, re: my body, wunderkammer, i&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s important to police the lines between fiction and autobiography but you&#8217;re certainly right in arguing that patchwork girl is better known&#8230;personally i saw them as equal works by an important writer and just had more to say about my body, wunderkammer. i wasn&#8217;t so much trying to do a straight history as a quick zoom in zoom out spotlight on a handful of works. there are too many to mention in so short a space. very excited to be engaging in this convo with you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://www.hydramag.com/2010/01/29/the-decade-of-literary-hypermedia/#comment-2840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehydramag.com/?p=1645#comment-2840</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a little strange to read a history of literary hypertext that omits Michael Joyce&#039;s _afternoon_ (1987), Stuart Moulthrop&#039;s _Victory Garden_ (1989), and Shelley Jackson&#039;s _Patchwork Girl_ among many other terrific hyperfictions!  (Is Jackson&#039;s _My Body, Wunderkammer_ a fiction?  In any case, I think _Patchwork Girl_ is far better known)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little strange to read a history of literary hypertext that omits Michael Joyce&#8217;s _afternoon_ (1987), Stuart Moulthrop&#8217;s _Victory Garden_ (1989), and Shelley Jackson&#8217;s _Patchwork Girl_ among many other terrific hyperfictions!  (Is Jackson&#8217;s _My Body, Wunderkammer_ a fiction?  In any case, I think _Patchwork Girl_ is far better known)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

